| File Name: | dodge challenger manual review.pdf |
| Size: | 3521 KB |
| Type: | PDF, ePub, eBook, fb2, mobi, txt, doc, rtf, djvu |
| Category: | Book |
| Uploaded | 18 May 2019, 21:42 PM |
| Interface | English |
| Rating | 4.6/5 from 655 votes |
| Status | AVAILABLE |
| Last checked | 5 Minutes ago! |
We may earn money from the links on this page.From 2015 to 2017, Challenger Hellcat production totaled about 22,000 cars, and Dodge says the take rate for the stick has been 35 percent. So they’re not exactly rare. Still Slower Than the Automatic We tested a manual Hellcat back in 2015 and made a disappointing discovery: The automatic car would put it on the trailer. The manual ran from zero to 60 mph in 3.9 seconds, trailing the automatic by three-tenths. Its quarter-mile performance of 11.9 seconds at 124 mph was 0.2 second and 2 mph slower. “If bragging rights are important (and how are they not with this car?),” we wrote, “the automatic is the one to have.” Getting all it can from its rear 20-inch Pirelli P Zero tires, the Challenger Hellcat Widebody automatic hits 60 mph in 3.8 seconds and storms through the quarter in 11.8 seconds at 126 mph. With the manual, however, it’s a 4.0-second run to 60 mph and a 12.4-second quarter-mile at 120 mph. That disappointing performance trails that of the much lighter but less powerful Chevy Camaro ZL1 manual and the Ford Mustang Shelby GT350R. That makes the Shelby, in particular, a bit of a giant killer, since it has the only naturally aspirated V-8 of the bunch and it’s down more than 180 horsepower to the Dodge. The Hellcat’s portly 4538 pounds is partly to blame here—with the Widebody coming in 69 pounds heavier than the already hefty standard model—but it’s really the tall gearing of the six-speed manual that slows this beast. With a 2.26:1 first, 1.58:1 second, and 1.19:1 third-gear ratio, the Tremec TR-6060 is just no match for the 4.71:1 first, 3.14:1 second, and 2.10:1 third of the optional ZF-supplied 8HP90 eight-speed automatic. And the six-speed’s 3.70:1 rear-axle gear, up from the automatic’s 2.62:1 ratio, just isn’t enough to make up the difference.http://www.zstelc.eu/content/file/c35-xantrex-manual.xml
Oh, the Hellcat manual will put you back in the seat and scare the bejesus out of any passengers, but if you just climbed out of the automatic, you’ll wonder if a plug wire has popped loose. The fix is to keep your foot down and throw gears like Dick Landy. The Hellcat gets plenty of tire scratch on the 1-2 upshift, and it’ll chirp those big rear 305s in third. Considering the Hellcat’s 650 lb-ft of torque, its twin-disc clutch is remarkably light, and its clean pickup makes stop-and-go traffic manageable. The shifter—which is canted forward a few degrees—is well placed, and its action takes just the right amount of muscle, but its throws could be shorter. The ball-shaped shift knob works fine, but this car is crying out for a Pistol Grip shifter. Handles Better Than Its Reputation So, it’s not the king of the drag strip, but that’s the Challenger Demon’s job description the last time we checked. The Hellcat Widebody manual is a more well-rounded beast with dance moves, impressive braking performance, and plenty of grip. It feels big, especially at first, but with practice you can pitch it into corners, rotate the big coupe around the mass of its powertrain, and drive it out on the throttle in a controlled slide. Just know that the howl of that 6.2-liter can be heard for miles and Johnny Law just may be waiting for you up over that rise. Don’t ask us how we know. In Sport and Track modes the Hellcat’s precise throttle response, along with its exceptional stability-control system, allows a driver to choose the rates of yaw and tire destruction without feeling as if the car is going to get away from you. Those bold enough can also shut down the system completely. Pedal placement makes heel-and-toe rev matching easy, and the 14.4:1 steering ratio is quick. These include a 10-hp increase for the Hellcat and a new model called the Redeye.http://alvit-bk.ru/userfiles/c337-skymaster-manual.xml
With technology lifted from the now defunct Demon, that last one will offer 797 horsepower, but like the Demon it will be automatic only. The Hellcat Widebody will remain the hottest Challenger with three pedals. And traditionalists, those who know there’s more to a great car than ultimate acceleration, will continue to beat the Challenger’s Hellcat engine with a stick. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion. Yet Dodge has managed to keep its muscle coupe feeling fresh by rolling out new versions regularly. From more horsepower to special-edition models, and from extended color palettes to go-fast options, there's seemingly a new Challenger every year. For all the changes, though, the basic nature of the Dodge Challenger remains the same. It's got big, brash personality with the driving fun to back it up.But the fender flares allow for fitting 305-section-width tires at each corner, whereas before the widest tires offered were 275s ( click here for a refresher of what all these tire codes mean ). That means more grip and, thus, more performance. With just a side-step of the clutch or blip of the throttle, it'll haze the Pirelli P-Zeros, roar like something straight out of the 1960s and tear away from other traffic. The 6.4-liter engine sounds phenomenal and delivers absolutely gigantic amounts of power. Yet it's not so overwhelming or overpowering that I can't exploit or enjoy it on a public road. The license-endangering Challenger Hellcat this is not. Adding to the enjoyment are the long, heavy and mechanical shifts from the Tremec six-speed manual gearbox. No, it's not the type of slick transmission you can shift with two fingers. Instead, each shift requires a bit of muscle and a bit of heft, and there's a satisfying mechanical feel as the transmission slots into gear.
Gears one through four are closely spaced for incredible pace; five and six are such tall overdrives (for fuel economy) that you'll be surprised how often you need to downshift on the highway. If only the throttle tip-in weren't so jumpy and the pedals better placed for heel-toe action, this transmission would be perfect. The optional eight-speed automatic probably suits the laid-back, big-power nature of the Challenger a little better -- but it just isn't as much fun. The naturally aspirated 6.4-liter V8 engine may be thirsty, but it makes excellent noises and loads of power. Even more impressive is the car's composure pointing into bends, thanks to the upgraded anti-roll bars, stiffer springs and three-mode adaptive dampers of this Widebody version. The Dodge is seriously poised and accurate when directed along twisting roads. The new Widebody package also pays dividends here: Dodge says that on a 2.1-mile road course, the new model would turn in lap times two seconds quicker than last year's Scat Pack. Claimed at 4,308 pounds, this Challenger is 565 pounds heftier than a stick-shift Ford Mustang GT, and 9 inches longer than one, too. That just makes it all the more impressive that the Challenger, while far from dainty or nimble, handles turning and stopping as well as it does. As to that latter part, six-piston Brembo front brakes clamp down hard, with a pleasantly firm pedal feel that makes reigning in the rampaging V8 a cinch. Modern interior tech To keep you entertained when you're not exercising the car's performance, the Dodge Challenger features the familiar Uconnect touchscreen infotainment system. With quick responses, big buttons that are easily legible at a glance and a simple menu structure, it remains one of our favorite in-car systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are both supported. A reconfigurable color instrument cluster puts plenty of information right in the driver's sightline, too.
Adaptive cruise and forward-collision warning are only offered on automatic-equipped Challengers, however, so it's not featured on my test car. Being a performance model, the Challenger's touchscreen also has go-fast options. Electronic line lock, which holds the front brakes so you can do burnouts, as well as launch control with an adjustable rev limit, are newly optional this year. Various gauges in the instrument cluster and infotainment screen allow for monitoring details like engine output and fluid temperatures, while various timers permit measuring acceleration, braking and G-force figures. The Challenger also wins big for being, well, big on the inside. The cabin is roomy in both rows of seats. Unlike a Camaro or Mustang, there are three seatbelts in back and enough space that adult passengers could fit comfortably for more than a brief jaunt down the block. Too, the Dodge's 16.2-cubic-foot trunk capacity shames the Ford and Chevy. You might wonder if that matters much in a performance coupe, but it could be what makes the Challenger a livable daily-driver car for some shoppers. The Challenger's cabin is notably roomier than its two key rivals, the Ford Mustang and the Chevy Camaro. Though rated for 14 miles per gallon city and 23 mpg highway, the Challenger returned much worse economy in my care because I couldn't resist romping on the loud pedal.How I'd spec it Just like this. Still, all-in my test car cost less than the entry price of the SRT Hellcat. Considering the horsepower and fun on offer, that's a great deal. Of course, what's so endearing about the Dodge Challenger is that there's one for everyone. Car enthusiasts with a penchant for noisy, tire-screeching performance cars that put a big grin on their face will love the Scat Pack Widebody. But whichever version you choose, pretty much anyone will be able to comprehend the appeal of the Challenger's bold retro looks and immensely fun nature.
While the Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang have added more handling prowess to their repertoire, the big-boned Dodge Challenger is still all about horsepower and customization. It remains the truest incarnation of the classic early 1970s muscle car. It offers a host of advanced driver safety aids along with one of the best infotainment systems on the market. It can even be had with all-wheel drive and ventilated seats. But all that modernity doesn't take anything away from its street cred. If you check the right boxes, you can have your Challenger with a nearly unbelievable 797 horsepower, a Widebody kit and steamroller-esque tires. And then there's the personalization options — wild paint colors, graphics packages and various styling add-ons to ensure you and your Challenger will always get attention. If you want absurdity, you can always take it up a notch to the new 807-horsepower drag-racing machine dubbed the SRT Super Stock. Their V8 engines provide loads of power and sound great. The Camaro and Mustang are also a bit easier to maneuver than the hulking Dodge and return mildly better fuel economy. But Dodge is right to be proud of the latest Challenger since it offers an unmatched combination of power, comfort and convenience. There's nothing quite like the Challenger, and that fuels much of its appeal. But drivers who value comfort and utility will likely prefer the Dodge. How does it drive? 7.5 The Challenger is always a hoot to drive. With the 6.4-liter V8, power is readily available in any gear at almost any speed. Zero to 60 mph took just 4.9 seconds at the Edmunds test track. It's properly quick but slower than other modern muscle cars by a few tenths. Braking is strong. Our test Challenger stopped from 60 mph in 105 feet, a short distance for such a big vehicle. The Dodge's beefy size makes in-town maneuvering a bit tough, but it's a champ out on the open road. The Challenger is pretty capable on curvy roads too.
Well, as long as you don't try driving it like a nimble sports car. Its mass and weight become readily apparent if you try to drive quickly through tight turns. Highway ride quality is very good, and seat comfort is near the top of the class. A relatively quiet cabin helps make this a nice place to be for long rides. The climate is controlled via the touchscreen or knobs and buttons directly behind the shifter. Our test car had the optional heated and ventilated front seats. The seat heating works well but the ventilation could be more effective. How’s the tech? 8.0 This is one of the best plug-and-play systems out there. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto accompany the Challenger's already user-friendly Uconnect system. It's very easy to use with multiple solutions for the same commands. But the interface looks a bit dated compared to the rest of the class. Voice controls use an easy-to-learn structure and accept basic commands for the audio, navigation and hands-free calling. Connecting your smartphone makes things even more familiar. The Driver Convenience package adds blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert. They worked well during our test without false alerts. How’s the storage? 8.0 Big American coupes aren't exactly perfect examples of utility, but the Challenger leads the class easily in this category. The trunk opening is large, and its capacity blows the class away with a midsize-sedan-like 16.2 cubic feet of cargo space. There's decent small-item storage throughout the cabin, but the cupholders are right behind the gearshift, which is somewhat problematic with a manual transmission. The door pockets are small, with small bottle holders up front. In coupes this size, space is at a premium, but the Challenger uses what it has relatively well. How economical is it? 5.5 EPA estimated-fuel economy for the 6.4-liter V8 is 17 mpg combined. That's one of the lowest ratings in the segment, even before you add the Widebody package.
The wide tires add rolling resistance as well, making real-world fuel economy even lower. In our testing, we struggled to even meet the EPA's city estimate of 14 mpg. Is it a good value? 7.0 The Challenger offers decent equipment for the money. The 6.4-liter engine is appropriately priced against other V8 upgrades in the class. The Widebody package adds big bucks to the price tag, but the resulting wheel, tire and suspension upgrades — not to mention the enhanced visual swagger — make it worth it. The Challenger's interior build quality is solid, but the quality of the materials becomes less appealing the higher you go up the trim ladder. By the time you're into Hellcat territory, it'll be obvious that you're paying for a big motor, not an exquisite interior design. Wildcard 9.0 The Challenger, especially with the Widebody package, is an American muscle car with a heaping helping of personality. It'll put a massive smile on your face every time you drive it. It's also surprising how well the car's styling has aged considering that the car has been around for more than a decade without a full redesign. Which Challenger does Edmunds recommend. This is the least expensive way to experience Dodge's throaty 6.4-liter V8 engine, and you can even get it with a six-speed manual transmission. You can add a head-spinning number of options on top of the decent amount of standard equipment. Consider going for the Dynamics package for the more powerful brakes as well as the Driver Convenience and Technology Groups for features such as rear cross-traffic alert and adaptive cruise control. Rear-wheel drive is standard, and all-wheel drive is available on SXT and GT trims. It retains the powertrain found in the SXT and adds upgraded interior trim, remote start and rear parking sensors. All-wheel drive is optional for the SXT and the GT. An eight-speed automatic is optional. It also comes with more standard features such as an 8.
4-inch touchscreen, heated seats, a heated steering wheel, and performance software upgrades such as launch control. There's a supercharged 6.2-liter V8 (717 hp, 656 lb-ft) and either a six-speed manual or an eight-speed automatic transmission to dole out the power. Dodge also adds larger brakes, exterior styling changes and an adaptive suspension to the mix of standard equipment. The SRT Hellcat Redeye package raises the Hellcat's power output to 797 hp and 707 lb-ft and comes solely with an eight-speed automatic. Still want more? OK, check out the SRT Super Stock. It puts out 10 more horsepower than the vaunted Redeye and also comes standard with the Widebody kit, lightweight Brembo brakes, a revised suspension and gripper tires for better drag-racing performance. I have read reviews saying that this car is bulky and poor handling but I strongly disagree with this and contend that the problem lies in the lack of a driver with extensive experience driving these types of cars. It feels just as light and maneuverable as a heavily modified 1968 Barracuda (10 grand in the suspension alone) I own that weighs almost an entire Mazda Miata less than the Challenger. If you know how to drive, you will have the ability to get the most out of this car, which is what will actually make the difference between being faster or slower than your neighbor with a Mustang or a Camaro. Power is amazing. In 1st, 2nd, and 3rd gear the engine redlines as though it were free revving in neutral, you better pay attention because the shift points are going to come very quickly. Traction control is obviously working very well at this point because normally with this kind of power being applied a car will fishtail all around making it necessary to see saw the steering wheel to stay on the road. 4th isn't much slower winding out and is good for an easy 120. 5th gear was as high as I went on my little acceleration trial and I backed off at 132mph with still another 1500 rpm to go until redline.
Again, this all seemed very easy for the car to do, and whats more the car felt rock solid at 132mph and felt as though it could easily go much faster and stay firmly planted on a country road, bumps, dips, and all. My Barracuda requires a smooth race track to go 132mph. The Challenger is heavy for a reason. A lighter car would become airborne on these rural roads I drive on. And I love how solid it is. Going over railroad tracks really tells me how solidly this car is built. Everything is screwed together very tightly. I know I will own and enjoy this car for many years. 5 out of 5 stars, Big. This car handles much better than it is given credit for, especially in the models with a stiffer or adjustable suspension. Yeah, and it's more comfortable than any other coupe in it's class. If you want a sports car, go get a Corvette or Mustang or Camaro. It's a blast to drive!!! Its not some Japaneze techno-dildo or Euro-trash slush-box. Its a real live American Muscle Car. Strong, Stable, Dependable, Well Built and Powerful. I feel sorry for the poorly informed little Yuppies who think that a foreign car is the way to go. Well they are wrong. The Dodge Challenger RT is a pure Joy to drive, and the technology doesn't get in the way of a good time. It handles very well. (Granted you have to possess some actual muscle in your arms, but a little masculinity is a good thing) It accelerates like a avalanche. And best of all, I can turn off the digital display and traction control with a push of a button and just use the tach, keep an eye on the oil pressure and temp gauge, and just.Drive. Other cars just seem to Vanish, at some.Point. 5 out of 5 stars, Not too shabby. Should have purchased sooner. Write a review See all 17 reviews 2020 Dodge Challenger videos Best Muscle Cars — Chevy Camaro, Dodge Challenger and Ford Mustang, But What Else. Best Muscle Cars — Chevy Camaro, Dodge Challenger and Ford Mustang, But What Else.
ELANA SCHERR: Everybody on my Instagram is posting push-up challenges right now. Don't worry. You are not going to get any exercise posts from me. But that doesn't mean I'm not interested in building muscle. I just prefer burnouts to pull-ups. Then there's going to be giant burnout. This is going to be great. The term muscle car came about in the late '60s and early '70s, but you don't have to have a classic car to flex your muscle. This is my top 10 list of modern muscle cars. Oh, we need rules. If we're doing this, we need rules, right? OK. Horsepower divided by torque with cylinders-- how many, eight. American, four doors, two doors. Could be all-wheel drive. How long a burnout versus how fast. This is hard. In the old days, a muscle car was an American car company's most powerful engine in its sportiest mid-sized car. Think GTO, Hemi Charger, Big Block Chevelle. Then there were the pony cars, which is where you'd get your Challengers, Camaros, Mustangs, AMC, AMXs. Following those rules now would mean that this entire list would be nothing but Camaro, Challenger, and Mustang in various trim levels from base V8 to top of the line-- all great cars, but kind of a boring video. So I opened up the definition to all makes and models. These are my only criteria. Number one, it's available now or it was within the last couple of years. Number two, it's one of the most powerful cars made by the company, and driving it will make you laugh. I expect this list is going to make you very angry. Heck, it made me angry, and I wrote it. Let's get to it. Number 10, Tesla Model S Performance. Are you mad yet? OK, well, half of you get to commenting about how it's totally unacceptable for Tesla to be on a muscle car list, and the other half of you get to commenting about how it's totally unacceptable for it not to be number one on the muscle car list. Let me just tell you why I picked it and put it where it is-- so freaking fast.
Sure, no V8 engine, no engine at all, but the Tesla's performance is out of this world. And it has a lot of kind of trick options for showing off, which is very muscle car era. It has a 0 to 60 time of 2.4 seconds. That's half, half of what it took a classic muscle car. Modern times, modern muscle. So why isn't the Tesla higher on the list. Well, first of all, price. And I don't think a muscle car has to be cheap necessarily, but it should be cheaper than that. Mostly, though, it's about sound. Sound is a really important part of the muscle car experience, and the Tesla just doesn't do it for me. Sorry. Yes, yes, I did. But blame Mark Takahashi. Then Mark came in, and he was like, no, M8 because it's a two door. It's more muscly. And you know, I just didn't have the energy to fight with him. I think he could take me, really. Think he could kick my ass. Point is, BMW makes some monster muscle. And the all-wheel drive M8 has a rear wheel drive mode so you can kick out the back end and do those very important burnouts. Number eight, Nissan GT-R. Why is the GT-R on this list. Well, it is brutally, stupidly fast. It has a 0 to 60 time that competes with the Tesla, and it can do it all day long. Plus, it's kind of unexpected in Nissan's lineup. It's funny to look back at the early days of Pontiac and Chrysler and realize how stodgy those brands were, and then bam, GTO. The GT-R is kind of Nissan's version of that. Why is it back at number eight. And it's a V6. Yes, it's a nearly 600-horsepower V6, but still it is missing some cylinders. Got to be a V8, new rule that I just made up right now. Number seven, Mercedes AMG E63 and the Audi S8. Yep, it's a tie. It's a tie of two cars that at first glance shouldn't even be on this list, but hear me out. It's a tie because both the Mercedes and the Audi are nearly 600 horsepower. The AMG is a little bit over, and the S8's a little bit under. Both are surprisingly fast, faster than anything that big has a right to be.
Why are big luxury cars on my muscle car list. Again, if we go back to the muscle car era, the big engines came out of big cars. And the Chrysler 300 and huge cube Cadillacs were surprisingly powerful. Also, a lot of the popular cars like, say, Plymouth Roadrunner were available in wagon form like the Mercedes is. So you could get a big engine in an unexpected body, and that makes it a sleeper, which everyone knows is the coolest relative of the muscle car. This is an '81 Trans Am, so it made about 200 horsepower. It's not really impressive compared to the classic muscle cars. Made about 400. But in '81, there wasn't much that was making more. So I'm going to say '81 Turbo Trans Am, still a muscle car-- just little muscle. Number six, the Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk. Yeah, you heard me. The Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk is powered by the same engine that Dodge put in the Charger and Challenger-- 700 horsepower, 6.2-liter Hemi. So yeah, it is an SUV, but I mean, with all that horsepower and kind of a low stance, it's not really an off-roader. So if it isn't a muscle car, what is it. I'm making a new rule. Anything with a Hellcat engine is a muscle car. But nothing with four doors can be in the top three. Is that OK? Is that OK with you. Yeah? Going to be all right. He says it's OK. Number five is the Lexus RC F. It's the least horsepower on this list, with a 5 liter making 472 horses. What a world we live in when nearly 500 horsepower isn't bragworthy. The Lexus is on our list because it looks so muscly, with a long hood, and a short deck, and rear wheel drive, two doors. Plus, if you pay more, you can get a wing. And nothing is more muscly than a wing. Just ask anyone with a Plymouth Superbird. Number four Dodge Hellcat Charger. Dang those pesky rear doors. The Charger has the distinction of being the only car on our list to have been an actual muscle car by the strictest standards.
Dodge introduced the Charger in 1966 and redesigned it in 1968 to the more famous Coke bottle design. In my opinion, that second-generation Charger is one of the prettiest American cars ever made. And it's also a very famous design. Seen it in movies like Bullet and Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry. It's also in a TV show. What was it called? Um-- Dukes of Hazzard. I don't know. I never heard of it. Today's Charger has too many doors to crack the top three-- see the rule that I made during number six-- but it's one of the best all-around cars on our list, impressive even in 392 trim and downright remarkable as a Hellcat. Onto the pony cars. I wish I could declare a three-way tie for the top three because each one is good in a different muscular way. At number three is the Chevy Camaro, obviously ZL1 because it's top dog with 650 horsepower. But a Camaro SS still lifts plenty of weight. The reason the Camaro isn't higher on the list is because the back seat is small, and visibility is bad. And those are sports car attributes. A proper muscle car shouldn't feel cramped. Number two is the Dodge Challenger Hellcat Redeye. With two doors and a couple of variants of the incredible Hellcat engine, what else could it be but the Dodge Challenger. I mean, Redeye gets the pick because 797 horses. But the 717 horse regular Hellcat is no slouch, nor for that matter is the 392, the 485 horses. The Challenger is the closest to a traditional muscle car on our list despite being based on a pony car design. It's roomy, comfortable, and happiest in a straight line rather than a corkscrew. That said, all the cars on this list are astonishing performers on a road course, as well as a drag strip. There's just no room for one-trick ponies anymore. And here we are, number one, the car that put the pony in pony cars, the Ford Mustang. For maximum muscle, we're going to go with the GT500 with its 760 horsepower and 11-second quarter mile times.
But like the others in the top three, the base GT is good too, everything a muscle car needs-- horsepower, style, legacy, the ability to make you look powerful even if you've never seen the inside of a gym. That's why it's our number one. If you want more details on exactly why the top three ended up in the order that they did, watch our previous muscle car comparison from back in the days when we were all allowed to hang out together and go to race tracks. Oh my god, that was hard. I hate top 10 lists. I'm going to go online and start arguing with myself. You should too. Tell me what you'd put on your top 10 list. She also explains what makes a classic muscle car and gives her Top 10 picks for the best modern muscle cars on sale. Forward Collision Warning Helps prevent collisions by sounding an alert when the Challenger detects an imminent collision. Rear Cross-Traffic Alert Sounds a warning if a vehicle is approaching the Challenger from the side while it's backing into traffic. NHTSA Overall Rating The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration offers independent analysis.Chevrolet Camaro If practicality and comfort are near the top of your list, the Challenger is far and away the better car in this matchup. The Camaro's trunk is tiny, and the back seat is equally useless. Then there's the issue of visibility. You thought the Challenger was hard to see out of. The Camaro is worse. But the Camaro performs far better than the Challenger on the road when the pavement starts to twist and turn. Ford Mustang The Challenger has always been an outlier among modern muscle cars due to its larger footprint. That's especially evident when it's pitted against the Ford Mustang. The Mustang looks and drives like the smaller car that it is, but whatever it gains in terms of nimble handling, it gives back when it comes to practicality. The Challenger can hold four adults and a lot of cargo, while the Mustang is really only comfortable for two.